Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • Structure your article according to "JOTED_Formatting Guidelines"
  • Font and paragraph formatting according to "JOTED_Formatting Guidelines"
  • Header according to "JOTED_Formatting Guidelines"
  • Tables according to "JOTED_Formatting Guidelines"
  • Figures according to "JOTED_Formatting Guidelines"
  • Other according to "JOTED_Formatting Guidelines"
  • The agreement to submit of all authors who were involved and are mentioned in the article is available for submission
  • A professional proofreading was carried out.

Author Guidelines

A template for the formatting of the contributions is available for you to Download. (Manual + Checklist)

We kindly ask authors to propose three suitable reviewers when submitting their manuscript. The suggestions should include the reviewers’ names, institutional affiliations, and email addresses, and should be submitted together with the manuscript.

Empirical research articles should follow the structure outlined below:

  1. Introduction
  2. Theoretical background (including, among other aspects, initial problem setting, relevance, research gap, objectives, etc.)
  3. Current state of research
  4. Empirical study (including, among other aspects, research questions, description of the sample, description of instruments, implementation of the study, and data analysis)
  5. Results
  6. Summary, limitations, and outlook

In addition to research articles, practice-oriented reports may also be submitted. This format is specifically intended for practitioners who wish to ground their educational practice in theory and reflect on it within an academic framework. A clear theoretical reference should always be evident (what is being done and why it is being done in this particular way), along with its practical implementation (didactic and methodological details) and a subsequent in-depth reflection, with or without evaluation findings (how the intended approach was implemented and how it manifested in practice).

We therefore welcome well-founded and reflective practice reports that should address the following criteria:

  1. Topical relevance
  2. Relevance to technical education
  3. Curricular integration
  4. Didactic and methodological grounding (theoretical framework)
  5. Objectives of the didactic-methodological setting
  6. Detailed description (illustration) of the implementation/practice (no fictional concepts) and the experiences gained
  7. Reflection on these experiences (if possible, including evaluation findings) in relation to theory and intended objectives

APC: For this journal we have no fees.

Privacy Statement

Names and email-addresses, which are used on the websites of our journal, are only used for the already mentioned purposes and they are not placed at the disposal of third parties.